Unconstitutional Book Banning Essay Example for Free

Unconstitutional volume illegalize Es interpretImagine youre in graduate school and youre doing your doctorate on a controversial issue. Youve done most of the research however theres one retain that has limited information that you need, and you can only find it in that particular defend. Youve looked on the online database and find fall out that the book is in your universities library. You go to the library and ask for some help finding the book you need, however the bibliothec informs you that the book was recently banned. How is it that in a country that prides itself in independence of speech and self expression, a book on a controversial issue has been banned? Does it not contradict what the founding fathers fought so hard for in the Revolutionary war? In todays society the biggest reason for book banning is based on protecting moral values set in place in the home. Well meaning teacher, p bents, and other would be censors worry that by exposing the nations youth to concepts such(prenominal) as sex, drugs, and alcohol they will start experimenting with these things.Ultimately they fear the breakdown of the moral values express in the home. This is especially true for conservative Christians, in the past ten years books such as J. K. Rowlings Harry Potter series and, Philip Pullmans His Dark Materials have caused a great hoi polloi of controversy among conservative Christians. The idea of magic, alternate and parallel universes is not a popular one among conservative Christians. But does this really warrant all out banning books such as these?Most would say no, the ideals of a certain group should not determine what the rest of the population reads. The ideals of a minority should not determine what books are left on the shelves of libraries. Its one thing if the private institutions chose not to inventory certain books in their libraries, but it is a different matter entirely when they want to take books out of the public libraries where th ey are put for the enjoyment of the public. Banning books violates one of the fundamental rites the US was built on, freedom of speech and freedom of press.The freedom to read and write freely is fundamentally American. It allows citizens to express themselves without fearing repercussions from the government, or confrere citizens. It allows readers to read freely and make their own decisions. Book banning would create a narrow apt(p) population, who dont know how to reason for themselves. Thinking again of the argument of preserving family values, it must be taken into consideration the kind of television that is currently airing. In many ways TV is more graphic, and explicit. hitherto it is tolerated, whereas even just crude language is apparently cause enough to ban a book. Parents are also worried about when their children who are reading above grade level are assign books intended for students three to four grades above them. This can expose junior readers to seemingly ina ppropriate material. barely there are other options, parents can talk to teachers and ask for more age appropriate books for their younger readers. Banning books violates the rites that our founding fathers fought so hard for in the Revolutionary War.Works CitedBeatserfield, Suzanne M. Parental Concerns About Book Content Should Not Be Dismissed. English Journal 97. 3 (2008). Opposing Viewpoints. Web. 10 Nov. 2011. Connelly, Deborah S. To Read Or Not To Read Understanding Book Censorship. Community Junior College Libraries 15. 2 (2009) 83-90. ERIC. Web. 10 Nov. 2011. Gallo, Don. Teens Need forward Books. English Journal 97. 3 (2008). Opposing Viewpoints. Web. 10 Nov. 2011. Manning, Erin. Parents Must Protect Children from Offensive Material in Books. MercatorNet. (2009). Opposing Viewpoints. Web. 10 Nov. 2011.