Political Ideology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Political political theory - Es theorize ExampleHowever, Alexandre Kojve, describe the platonic ideology not only as the science of ideas more over also as a science of object reality in his Essai dune histoire raisonne de la philosophie paenne (vol. II, Platon et Aristote). capital of South Dakota Daunou, Constantin-Franois Volney, Pierre Cabanis, and Dominique Garat, claims to be an ideology as Destutt de Tracy, simply the term was used to belittler or express disapprover of it by forty winks and Franois Ren de Chateaubriand. 1Also, Karl Marx, present ideology as a critical sense that displayed the opposition between the noble senses disposed to ideology by Destutt de Tracy, which is having a negative meaning. In Germany, ideology, as an expression of alienation and it is essentially incompetent of dialectical relationship that unit or resist those representation. Ideology would then be seen as the handling of a sectionalization, a party, or an association that seeks to cult ural achievement, political post, economic, intellectual, spiritual, or other domination over society and individuals. Communist are different from other working class because they point out and work out about the common interest of the entire proletariat, independently of the citizen, they represent the interest of the movement entirely. As a result of this, Marxs and Engels view that Communist were not a partisan attachment to any form of organization, but only to the working class beyond it and the class as a whole. Successful or not, Marx and Engels be possessed of never for a day played a full time political leader of a party organization or active leader of mass working class organization or elite vanguards, unlike Kautsky, Lenin, or Mao. They only serve as an intellectual to the emerging German amicable Democrats and other working-class parties in Europe.Engels, work did more than marxs to attract and convert people to the must authoritative political parties or movement of the modern times. As a result of this, we can absurd to say that Engels invented Marxism. He was not only the first Marxist historian, but also an anthropologist, philosopher, and commentator on the primaeval Marx. Presently, Marx and engels are protected from being denounced by certain activists as hypocritical idealist whose political cognition is at variance with their theory. The communist in the world today are very few because those who regain they are communist are deeply involve in political groups that demand primary commitment to themselves rather than to the working class. Whereby the definition of political ideology of both Marx and Engels, which is in the interest of the working class as a whole, turns out never to be at variance with the interests of their own political party. 13On the other hand, Gramsci depart from the definition of hegemony that was widely accept by Marxist during the worldwide economic first gear in the early 30s, when Marxism theory failed in most advanced capitalist nations of the west. This was considered by Lenin to be a strategy of political leadership in the democratic revolution where leadership was base on a fundamental alliance with the peasantry. He did not